I
don’t believe Charles Manson and his infamous Family needs any introduction. As
far as serial killers go, Manson is probably the most recognizable name. Even
people who know little to nothing of famous killers have heard of Manson. To
get a deeper look at the story of the Tate/LaBianca murders and the Manson
cult, Helter Skelter: The True Story of
The Manson Murders by Vincent Bugliosi with Curt Gentry is an enlightening
read. It should also come with a wall length corkboard and push pins for the
reader to construct a visual diagram of all the information packed into this
volume.
Multiple
books, interviews, documentaries, blogs, and movies tackle the story of Manson,
his followers, and the murders. Each source offers a different perspective on
the topic. This book is authored by the DA that prosecuted Manson and the three
girls involved in the murders. It comes as no surprise then that the book is
structured from the perspective of building a case against Manson, Atkins,
Krenwinkel, and Van Houten. The details of the crime scenes, pieces of
interviews conducted by the authorities regarding the case, and the details of
the court proceedings are thoroughly explored. For anyone interested in the
case, this book is a wealth of knowledge. It’s downright addicting as the
reader gets to help construct, through Bugliosi, how the murders occurred and
the warped lives of the Manson Family.
This
flood of information is a much as a negative as it a positive. The list of
names at the beginning of the book is only one small sample of how much
knowledge the reader is going to drown in. There is no way to keep track of
everyone. At some point, the reader will have to figure out who this person is
that just took the stand. The name is familiar, but there were dozens of people
mentioned by this point in the book. The time frame the Tate’s maid washed down
the windows with vinegar is discussed. The backgrounds of each person involved,
including such players as the two inmates that Susan Atkins told she was
involved in the murders. Dates, times, and police slip-ups; all documented and ready
to be waded through by the reader. This is a book that begs for the reader to
take notes while reading it, or utilize their giant cork board. Simply put,
this is not a lite, easy read.
The work
includes the thoughts and assumptions of Bugliosi, which adds a nice personal
touch to the text. Bugliosi isn’t overly preachy; however he does make it clear
what he thinks of the people he encounters during the investigation/case. This
made the book a bit more accessible. Instead of a dry reading of a case file,
this had tid-bits that provided a tone for the story. His impressions,
especially of the girls, and his openness about the often problematic way the
police handled the investigation gave a sense of informalness to an otherwise
formal recount of the events. At the same time, Bugliosi is obviously presenting
his take on the case. The exact happenings at Spahn Ranch and the Family
dynamics are his interpretations. The book therefore lacks any other viewpoints
(interviews aside) besides Bugliosi and the facts of the matter.
As to the psychos
of the book, Manson and his murderous followers, the text gives interesting insight
into these people. Backgrounds, interviews, and outrageous courtroom antics are
all recorded. The Family’s vision of the
future by a Helter Skelter race war is pieced together throughout Bugliosi’s investigation.
As far as hooking the reader, this is the real kicker. The murders were savage,
but the bizarre scheme that motivated them still captures the public. Although the
book isn’t able to take us into the cult fully, Bugliosi does a fantastic job
bringing up all the relevant disturbing activities/fantasies of the Family. It’s
chilling.
I’m torn on
how much I want to delve into my thoughts on Manson and the Family for this blog
post. Honestly, I could keep a blog devoted solely to the topic and never run
out of things to write. However, I also want to keep my focus on the book I’m
reviewing and not wander too much to the overall topic behind it. So, I’ll
briefly mention a couple of my own curiosities on the case and what Begliosi
mentions of them.
There is much
debate over whether Manson’s followers were mindless slaves to his will or
willing participants. I got the impression from this book that Begliosi
believed Manson had completely brainwashed his followers, yet they already had
the potential for violence before meeting him. To a degree, I feel the same.
However, I don’t think Manson is the mastermind that he is usually portrayed
as. He strikes me a brilliant manipulator, but I think the people that
surrounded him helped to build the Helter Skelter fantasy. I think they weren’t
so much slaves as they were under the influence of a frenzied group delusion
with Manson as the messiah.
Was the
evidence of the trail enough to prove guilt or did the media hype of the
murders and the defendants lead to a guilty verdict without enough substantial
proof? This question has always fascinated me. I feel there is enough evidence
to prove the family is involved in the murders, but besides a few fingerprints
of one suspect and the gun (which could have been in anyone from the ranch’s
possession), much of the case was built on testimony. It’s hard to sift out the
truth from the lies in this case.
The book does
give a through explanation as to how the DA built their case. A lot more evidence
was used than I previously thought, but I’m still not fully convinced it was
enough on its own. The ineffective attorneys for the defense and the outbursts
of the defendants were an evident perk for the DA’s case. I still wonder if
Manson and the others had run a better defense, if Bugliosi would have gotten
the conviction. Several times in the text, Bugliosi points out instances, like Krenwinkel
denying to give a writing sample, that could have lead to the defendants freed
of charges or at least reduced sentences.
Overall, this
is a book for those that want to get a deeper view into the Manson murders. It’s
a long read, but one packed with interesting information on the case that will
keep pages turning. Devote some time to this one. Prepare to be inspired to do
more research and spend a chunk of your life boarding on obsession over the
case… and don’t forget the big board to plaster all your notes on.
Good warning about the obsession. I read so much about Manson the first time I read this book and then this time, I went a little nuts. I mean the first time, I was in middle school--no google, no Netflix! How'd I find out anything? But this time, yeah, I need that cork board. That would have been a great idea too.
ReplyDeleteThis book was written in such a way, you couldn't help but get involved.
I felt like I was drowning in information. Names, events, motives, murders, there was so much that it was near impossible to remember who was who and why they did what they did. I felt like half the time reading was spent just flipping back to reread bits. Still, it was worth it, and it a way, the flurry of information and the format is reminiscent of the Manson murders. I think the formatting suits the book.
ReplyDelete